Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 F.2d 574 - Burch v. Reading Co.

Burch v. Reading Co.’s Empirical Analysis

240 F.2d 574 · 1957

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
4
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Eshbach v. W. T. Grant's & Co. (1973), Sano v. Pennsylvania Railroad (1960)

20 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

2701957196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Cent Co v. Johnson · Beckwith v. Town of Stratford · Narciso v. Mauch Chunk Township · Se-Ling Hosiery, Inc. v. Margulies

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““burden is to convince [the factfinder] upon all the evidence before [it] that the facts asserted by the plaintiff are more probably true than false ... the [factfin-der] must at least be convinced that the evidence considered as a whole, its “preponderance” to use the traditional term, indicates that the facts asserted by the plaintiff are probably true.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “upon all the evidence ... the facts asserted by the plaintiff are more probably true than false.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““It is her [plaintiff’s] burden to convince you that there was this negligence, Also, if the question of whether or not such negligence was a factor in causing the injury is so evenly balanced in your mind that you have no conviction, then you must find for the defendant.” “The evidence must do more than raise a doubt in your mind on these points, if plaintiff is to sustain the burden. If there is just a doubt in your mind, you must bring in a verdict for the defendant, and that ends your consideration of the case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.