Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 F.2d 608 - Brunner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad

Brunner v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad’s Empirical Analysis

240 F.2d 608 · 1957

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
July 1986
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 1986

13 federal appellate ·

701957196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Quady v. Sickl · Zenner v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. · Kraskey v. Johnson · Cherney v. Holmes · Dinan v. Chicago & Milwaukee Electric Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(u)nder well established rules, plaintiff is entitled to have the credible evidence considered in the light most favorable to her. However, this does not mean that we may ignore uncontradicted, unimpeached evidence supporting defendants' position.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.