Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 F.2d 76 - Spriggs v. Hoffstot

Spriggs v. Hoffstot’s Empirical Analysis

240 F.2d 76 · 1957

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
June 1990
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1990

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

5019571960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Washingtonsouthern Nav Co v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co · Bardach Iron & Steel Co. v. Morgan · The Gloria · Partenreederei Wallschiff v. The Pioneer · The Grecian

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “allows the [court] discretion whether or not to require bond from the cross-respondent....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.