Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 F.3d 1312 - In Re: Jamko, Inc.

In Re: Jamko, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
November 2020
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2020

1 district ·

70200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Perrin v. United States · General Trading Incorporated v. Yale Materials Handling Corporation · Havelock v. Taxel · Angelo US v. Victoria Farms Inc · Tighe v. Celebrity Home Entertainment Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In addition to the filing fee paid to the clerk a quarterly fee shall be paid to the United States trustee, for deposit in the Treasury, in each case under chapter 11 of title 11 for each quarter (including any fraction thereof) until the case is converted or dismissed, whichever occurs first. The fee shall be $250 for each quarter in which disbursements total less than $15,000; $500 for each quarter in which disbursements total $15,000 or more but less than $150,000 ... The fee shall be payable on the last day of the calendar month following the calendar quarter for which the fee is owed. 28 U.S.C § 1930(a)(6)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We are cognizant of the positions made by other courts that this broad interpretation could be viewed as creating a “special tax” on reorganized debtors, especially when the UST does less after confirmation than before to “earn” these fees.... We respect these positions but decline to follow them. If change is necessary, it is a consideration for Congress, not the courts. 18”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “uncertainty developed as to whether the amendment applied retroactively to already pending cases with confirmed plans.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.