Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 F.3d 1317 - Tullius v. Albright

Tullius v. Albright’s Empirical Analysis

240 F.3d 1317 · 2001

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1401 (§ 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1435 (§ 324 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1503 (§ 360 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on United States v. Smith · Clemons v. Dougherty County · Hale v. Tallapoosa County · Drozd v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Rodgers v. Singletary

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the record presents factual issues, the court must not decide them; it must deny the motion and proceed to trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]ppellant claim[ed] that his father, who was a United States citizen at birth, transmitted citizenship to appellant” at appellant’s birth). 2 . Because we reach the merits of Petitioner's nationality claim, we do not address Petitioner’s argument that the BIA erred in dismissing Petitioner administrative appeal because his appeal waiver was not knowing and voluntary. 3 . As the Third Circuit noted in Morgan , the Fifth Circuit’s approach on this point in Nehme”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A] person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.