Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 F.3d 325 - Overnite Transportation Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Overnite Transportation Company v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis

240 F.3d 325 · 2001

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
January 2004
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co. · National Labor Relations Board v. Exchange Parts Co. · National Labor Relations Board v. Yeshiva University · National Labor Relations Board v. Nueva Engineering, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Id. at 49. Moreover, he was found to have denied pro-union employees the same opportunities to speak at the mandatory meetings as anti-union employees,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “publicized the withholding of the increase to demonstrate that voting for the Teamsters presented serious, adverse consequences.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “literally pulled [Union] papers out of the hands of one employee who was reading it and threw it in the trash.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.