State Street Bank and Trust Company As Trustee v. Denman Tire Corporation Denman Operating Corporation and the Denman Tire Corporation Pension Plan’s Empirical Analysis
240 F.3d 83 · 2001
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 36 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Operating Engineers Local 139 Health Benefit Fund v. Gustafson Construction Corp. (2001), Ritter v. Massachusetts Casualty Insurance (2003)
8 federal appellate · 36 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. Bruch · Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern California · 154 Ill. 2d 90 - Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance · Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Jacobson · Colonial Village, Inc. v. Spann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the contract in Latek did not include any language stating that a claim for breach of warranty must be filed within the limitations period. Nevertheless, the court found that the language was “rea sonably susceptible to only one meaning: that any claim based on warranties contained in the Purchase Agreement must be brought within [the specified time period] of the closing.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“parties are free to contract for a time period within which a suit may be brought ... which [is] less than the general statute of limitation period applicable to written contracts”) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted); Alcorn v. Raytheon Co., 175 F.Supp.2d 117 , 121 (D.Mass.2001) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“federal common law will only give rise to a claim pursuant to ERISA in the limited class of cases “where the issue in dispute is of central concern to the federal statute.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.