Kaplan v. Gelfond’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Ben Cooper, Inc. · V-1 Oil Co. v. Gerber · Johnson v. Celotex Corp. · In re Oxford Health Plans Inc., Securities Litigation · Katz v. Realty Equities Corp. of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1)the total number of shares purchased during the class period; (2) the net shares purchased during the class period (in other words, the difference between the number of shares purchased and the number of shares sold during the class period); (3) the net funds expended during the class period (in other words, the difference between the amount spent to purchase shares and the amount received for the sale of shares during the class, period); and (4) the approximate losses suffered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[d]ifferences in causes of action, defendants, or the class period do not render consolidation inappropriate if the cases present sufficiently common questions of fact and law, and the differences do not outweigh the interests of judicial economy served by consolidation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.