In re Certain Carriers’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Certain Carriers Represented by the Eastern, Western, & Southeastern Carriers' Conference Committees · Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Certain Carriers Represented by the Eastern, Conference Committees Etal., Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Certain Carriers Represented by the Eastern Carriers Conference Committees Etal., Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Union Pacific Railroad · Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad · 229 F. Supp. 259 - In re Certain Carriers Represented by the Eastern, Western, & Southeastern Carriers' Conference Committees
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It must be borne in mind, however, that while this Court may implement the award and compel compliance with it by orders such as have been indicated, it does not follow that this Court would have jurisdiction or would undertake the disposition of individual disputes between individual employees and the employing carriers. Disputes of that type are minor disputes to be determined locally.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.