Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 GAAPP 203 - Carter v. State

Carter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2007
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Robinson v. State · Mims v. State · Stubbs v. State · 93 Ga. App. 345 - Horne v. State · Chapman v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether [the victim’s] testimony was impeached was a jury question, and even if the jury determined that he had been impeached, his credibility was a matter for that jury. Chapman v. State, 263 Ga. 393, 394-395 (3) ( 435 SE2d 202 ) (1993). As stated in Chapman , “the impeachment of a witness does not change the direct evidence given by that witness into circumstantial evidence.” Id. at 395 (3).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.