Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 Iowa 255 - Addy v. Addy

Addy v. Addy’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
9
states following
December 2002
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 2002 · most notably 155 Ind. App. 65 - Bill v. Bill (1972), Davis Ex Rel. Grant v. Davis (1954)

36 state decisions

1301949195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennoyer v. Neff · Williams v. State of North Carolina · John Haddock v. Harriet Haddock · In Matter of Badger · Kelly v. Kelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A father cannot be relieved from the duty to support his minor children by agreement of the mother. * * *. “At common law and in most states the father is primarily liable for the support of his children. * # *. “However in this state * * #, the view prevails that even as between the parents they are under the same legal duty to support the children.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““There can be no question that upon birth of the child defendant became morally and legally obligated, aside from any statute, to support it during minority. He was not relieved of this obligation by the decree of divorce with its award of custody to the mother. While the decree severed the marital relation between husband and wife it did not divorce defendant from his obligation to provide for the wants of the child. [Citing cases] “* * * A father’s obligation to support his child is not abrogated by the fact the separation of the parents may have been caused by fault of the wife. Even where a divorce is granted to the father it is usually held he remains liable for support of children whose custody was awarded the mother. The child should not be denied his right to the support of his father because of dissension between the parents for which he was not to blame.” (Citing cases) (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.