Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 Kan. 149 - State v. Carmichael

State v. Carmichael’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

107
cited by 107 later decisions
6
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 104 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 107 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably State v. Aikins (1997), State v. Dunn (1988)

3 federal appellate · 104 state decisions

5401986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · State v. Humphrey · State v. Bressman · State v. Burton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A defendant has a constitutionally protected privilege to request and obtain from the prosecution evidence that is material to the guilt or innocence of the defendant. Suppression of such evidence is a violation of the defendant’s Fourteenth Amendment due process rights. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 , 10 L. Ed. 2d 215 , 83 S. Ct. 1194 (1963). Prosecutors are under a positive duty, independent of court order, to disclose exculpatory evidence to a defendant. To justify a reversal of a conviction for failure to disclose evidence, the evidence withheld by the prosecution must be clearly exculpatory and the withholding of the evidence must be clearly prejudicial to the defendant.””
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a matter of discretion whether the trial court permits either or both of the parties to reopen a case for introduction of additional evidence after having rested. [Citation omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “An abuse of discretion exists only when no reasonable man would take the view adopted by the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.