State v. Louis’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2014
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Brunner · State v. Gordon · State v. Costa · State v. Wise · State v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A person who has not been arrested is not in police custody unless there are significant restraints on his freedom of movement which are imposed by some law enforcement agency.'" 240 Kan. at 181 (quoting State v. Bohanan, 220 Kan. 121 , Syl. ¶ 2, 551 P.2d 828 [1976]).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the taking of a person into custody in order that the person may be forthcoming to answer for the commission of a crime. The giving of a notice to appear is not an arrest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the restraint of a person pursuant to an arrest or the order of a court or magistrate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.