Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 Kan. 21 - Lightner v. Frank

Lightner v. Frank’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
3
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

3 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2018

3 district · 16 state decisions

1001986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schmid v. Eslick · Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. · Reading Township v. Telfer · 79 Ill. 2d 324 - Bauer v. Johnson · Pierson v. Edstrom

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Imputed negligence may bar a plaintiff s recovery, but it does so not from culpabibty or wrongful act of the plaintiff but from liability for another person’s wrongful act. Such responsibihty or habihty is imposed by reason of the relationship. One such relationship giving rise to imputed negligence is loosely referred to as a joint adventure or joint enterprise.” 240 Kan. at 24 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]here must be equal responsibility ... and there can be no equal responsibility unless there is equal privilege and right to direct and control its operations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “there [must be] an understanding between the parties that [each] has the right and is possessed of equal authority....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.