Phillips v. Carson’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 6 district · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently April 2012 · most notably Bergstrom v. Noah (1999), Sheinkopf v. Stone (1991)
2 federal appellate · 6 district · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 547
Relies on Ford v. Guarantee Abstract & Title Co. · Dunn v. Jones · Theis v. duPont, Glore Forgan Inc. · Greep v. Bruns · Lawrence v. Deemy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A trial court has the inherent authority to summarily dispose of a matter on its own motion where there remains no genuine issue as to any material fact, and, giving the benefit of all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from the evidence, judgment must be for one of the parties as a matter of law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““A lawyer shall not enter into a business transaction with a client if they have differing interests therein and if the client expects the lawyer to exercise his professional judgment therein for the protection of the client, unless the client has consented after full disclosure.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Carson“it is a general rule that a creditor must consent to or ratify a judgment by confession. Such a judgment is not binding on the plaintiff unless the plaintiff consents to the judgment or later ratifies it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.