Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 MINN 113 - Elliott v. Adeckes

Elliott v. Adeckes’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2003

5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

70195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Minnesota Wheat Growers Co-Operative Marketing Ass'n v. Huggins · Clinton Cooperative Farmers Elevator Ass'n v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It appears from the cases, however, that the first, or so-called pooling co-operative, operates under a marketing agreement whereby it provides a marketing service for the products produced by its members by pooling their products and selling them at a time when the management of the cooperative association deems it advantageous to do so, depending on the condition of the market. Generally under this plan the pool is sold collectively. After deducting the expenses of the entire pool operation, the proceeds are distributed among the various producers in proportion to their respective contribution of products to the pool. . . . The second type . . . is the co-operative association which is set up for the purpose of purchasing the commodities, such as milk or cream, produced by its members or patrons, taking title thereto, and paying for them at the market price current at the time of delivery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.