Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 N.C. 109 - State v. Hall

State v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably State v. Riera (1970), State v. Felmet (1981)

41 state decisions

1401954196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Thomas · State v. Thomas · State v. Hill · State v. . McNeill · State v. . Peterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In State v. Hall, 240 N.C. 109 , 81 S.E. 2d 189 (1954), this Court said that Sections 12 and 13 (now Sections 22 and 23) of Article I of the State Constitution provide, ‘in essence, that the Superior Court has no jurisdiction to try an accused for a specific misdemeanor on the warrant of an inferior court unless he is first tried and convicted for such misdemeanor in the inferior court and appeals to the Superior Court from the sentence pronounced against him by the inferior court on his conviction for such misdemeanor.’ (Citations omitted.) ” Id., at 96.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.