Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 NW2D 662 - State v. Davis

State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2000
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2000

4 state decisions

201976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Michelson v. United States · Trudo v. United States · Gonzales v. United States · United States v. Hines · State v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where a motion in limine is resolved in such a way it is beyond question whether or not the challenged evidence will be admitted during trial, there is no reason to voice objection at such time during trial. In such a situation, the decision on the motion has the effect of a ruling.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.