Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 NW2D 846 - State v. Hendrickson

State v. Hendrickson’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
July 1996
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 1996

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

80197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Bollenbach v. United States · United States v. Gainey · State v. Allen · United States v. Bagby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That consumption of alcohol adversely affects judgment, reduces reaction time, dulls reflexes, and diminishes inhibitions is commonly known and accepted, as well as scientifically verified. See, e. g., 2 Schwartz, Trial of Automobile Accident Cases, § 914 (3d ed. 1972).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““2. Relevant evidence is evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of an action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.” 1”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Under Section 31-10-02(84), N.D.C.C., the jury and the court were entitled to take notice ‘[o]f such matters of common knowledge and science as may be known to all men of ordinary understanding and experience.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.