Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 N.Y. 379 - McMaster v. Gould

McMaster v. Gould’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
9
states following
March 2000
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently March 2000 · most notably Songbyrd, Inc. v. Estate of Grossman (2000), Leighton v. Roper (1950)

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 50 state decisions

220192519301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennoyer v. Neff · Pollock v. Farmers' Loan Traust Co · Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills v. Menefee · Helme v. . Buckelew · Robinson v. . Robins Dry Dock Repair Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * does not discriminate between a case where there are assets and a case where there are no assets, between an attempt to reach assets and an attempt to get a general judgment in personam. The California executor traveling in New York might be served with a summons.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * The foreign administrator as the official of another sovereignty exists only by virtue of the statute of another state, and has no legal existence in this state.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““ * * * the constitutionality of a statute, which in terms permitted suit to be brought or continued against foreign executors and administrators * * *»”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.