Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 Or. App. 330 - State v. Terry

240 Or. App. 330 - State v. Terry’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
February 2011
most recently cited

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Id. at 743-44, 243 P.3d 790 (emphasis in original). Here, as in Wibbens , the challenged evidence consisted of unsworn oral assertions that constituted hearsay and, as in Wibbens , we conclude that those assertions did not bear adequate characteristics of reliability. The assertions were not”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “received a call from [the] Medford Police that [defendant] had been involved in a domestic dispute with his victim,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “order. At the hearing on the motion, defendant's probation officer, Hubbard, testified that he had”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.