240 Or. App. 541 - State v. Chase’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"I think if the [legislature] and case law that surrounds this wanted it to be the exact quoted or paraphrased statements, they would have said that, but I think the particulars of the statements include basically a broader parameter, which is I think what has been satisfied. I'm not even sure * * * that the state's obligated to do that, other than just turnover the discovery, but I think the particulars of the statements being—who would the statement * * * come through as a witness, who the statement was given to, I think that that's sufficient."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Chase

2. “"There were only 53 pages of discovery total submitted to the defense. My point is to highlight that this is not a particularly large or voluminous case[.] "* * * I'm speaking of statements made by [the victim] at CARES Northwest contained in defense discovery pages 23 through 38, and I'm also referring to statements made by [the victim] to his grandmother * * * Chase, his mother * * * [and his aunt]."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Chase

3. “The trial court denied the motion, explaining that OEC 803(18a)(b) did not require that the state provide an exact quote or paraphrase of the statements; rather notice was sufficient if it stated to whom the statement was given and from whom the statement would come. In the trial court's view, the state's notice was sufficient. The court explained:”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Chase