Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 S.C. 203 - Lee v. Peek

Lee v. Peek’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 1984
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 1984

12 state decisions

80196219701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simon v. Flowers · Savage v. Cannon · Morgan v. State Farm Mutual Insurance · Michalson v. Roundtree · Bishop v. Jacobs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he general rule undoubtedly is that the neglect of the attorney is the neglect of the client.... The acts and omissions of the attorney in such case are those of the client.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The showing of neglect without a proper excuse is insufficient under both Section 10-609 and 10-1213.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.