Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 240 So. 2d 606 - Jackson v. Walker

240 So. 2d 606 - Jackson v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2015

10 state decisions

5019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on W. T. Raleigh Co. v. Armstrong · United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State ex rel. Tompkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`The failure to file this brief (by the appellee) is tantamount to a confession of error, and will be accepted as such and the judgment of the court below will be reversed, since an answer to the appellant's brief cannot be safely made by us, without our doing that which the appellee, by its attorney, should have done, i.e., brief the appellee's side of the case. This we are not called on to do, therefore the case falls within, and is governed by, W.T. Raleigh Co. v. Armstrong, 165 Miss. 380 , 140 So. 527 .'" [Quoting from Gulf M. & O. RR v. Webster County, 194 Miss. 660 , 13 So.2d 644 (1943)]. 204 So.2d at 852-853 .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Automatic reversal is not required where the appellee fails to file a brief. The appellant's argument "should at least create enough doubt in the judiciousness of the trial court's judgment that this Court cannot `say with confidence that the case should be affirmed.'" Where the appellant's brief makes out an apparent case of error, however, this Court is not obligated to look to the record to find a way to avoid the force of the appellant's argument.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.