240 So. 2d 835 - Polland v. Visual Graphics Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 2002
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A copy of any written motion which may not be heard ex parte and a copy of the notice of the hearing thereof shall be served a reasonable time before the time specified for the hearing.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“the effect of the rule is to require a party whose motion is to be heard to make sure that proper notice is given to the opposing party. This is true even though the court changes the time of the hearing. Of course the requirement for notice may be met by the court itself, either by proper announcement at the time originally scheduled or by written notice from the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Messner v. Dedeo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.