Marshall v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Knight v. State · 39 So. 3d 252 - State v. Montgomery · 774 So. 2d 637 - Rutherford v. Moore · 109 So. 3d 735 - Haygood v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[H]ad Marshall been placed in the Montgomery pipeline when this Court affirmed his conviction and sentence for second degree murder on direct appeal, we find it extremely likely, if not virtually certain, that Marshall ultimately would have been granted the new trial that he now seeks in his instant petition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The test for ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is whether: (i) the petitioner establishes that appellate counsel's performance was deficient; and (ii) that such deficient performance so prejudiced the petitioner as to undermine confidence in the result of the appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.