240 So. 3d 355 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Giglio v. United States · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · 775 So. 2d 1022 - State v. Casey · 505 So. 2d 714 - State v. Brooks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]lthough relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, or waste of time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[p]hotographs which illustrate any fact, shed light upon any fact or issue in the case, or are relevant to describe the person, place or thing depicted are generally admissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“trial court is vested with much discretion in determining whether the probative value of evidence is substantially outweighed by its prejudicial effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.