Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

240 So. 3d 907

State v. Carter

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 16, 2018

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2018-04-16

Decided 2018-04-16

Further, the 404(B) evidence which the state seeks to introduce is highly prejudicial. Even assuming, arguendo, that the state's evidence meets the strict standards of La.Code Evid. art. 404(B), the evidence is unquestionably more prejudicial than probative, in contravention of La.Code Evid. art. 403, and should not be allowed. Therefore, I would grant this writ, reverse the trial court's ruling, and deny the state's Prieur motion.
/240/so3d/907 · .json · Public domain