Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 Ala. 348 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 1999
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 1999

12 state decisions

40194119501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McMillan v. Aiken · Ex Parte Grimmett · Griffin v. State · Gast v. State · Hull v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It has long been the accepted rule in this jurisdiction that the court had the right to reject for cause ex mero motu the juror who on his qualification stated that he would not convict on circumstantial evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.