Rice v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
February 2003
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lauderdale v. State · Hummel v. State · Edens v. State · Boyd v. State · Thompson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Appellant’s main objection to this instruction is that he says the instruction should have told the jury that Stanley Robinson was an accomplice and not leave that issue to the jury. This is not the law and there was no reversible error, if it were, in fact, submitted to the jury.” Rice v. State, 241 Ark. 570 , 408 S.W. 2d 902 (1966). See also Hummel v. State, 210 Ark. 471 , 196 S.W. 2d 594 (1946). Boyd v. State, 215 Ark. 156 , 219 S.W. 2d 623 (1949).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. DuBois v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.