Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 B.R. 704 - In Re Davis

In Re Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
September 2010
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325

Relies on Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp. · Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. · Fidelity Federal Savings and Loan Association v. D Cuesta · Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendon · Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In addition to the clear language of the statute, most courts have perceived an inherent unfairness in a debtor paying himself by funding his own savings account, retirement plan, or pension fund while paying creditors only a fraction of them just claims. For these reasons the great majority of courts have held under Section 1325(b) that funds contributed to savings or pension plans constitute “disposable income” that must be paid to creditors under a plan if the plan is to be confirmed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he use of a phrase such as 'reasonably necessary' appears to invite the Court to look at the circumstances of each case and each individual debtor, and his or her obligations under State law or contract to determine whether such obligations are in fact reasonably necessary for the support of debtors and their dependents.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.