Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 CALAPP4TH 315 - People v. Bell

People v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida · United States v. Jorn · Oregon v. Kennedy · Mart Corporation v. Cartier Inc 47th Street Photo Inc · United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “' " 'The literal meaning of the words of a statute may be disregarded to avoid absurd results....' " [Citations.]' [Citation.] But the absurdity doctrine should only be used in ' " extreme cases ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “rewrite the statute[ ] under the absurd consequences doctrine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.