Modisette v. Apple Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rowland v. Christian · 26 Cal. 4th 465 - Merrill v. Navegar, Inc. · 134 S. Ct. 2473 - Riley v. Cal. United States · 51 Cal. 3d 120 - Moore v. Regents of University of California · 31 Cal. 4th 1074 - Schifando v. City of Los Angeles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a trial court sustains a demurrer without leave to amend, 'we must decide whether there is a reasonable possibility the plaintiff could cure the defect with an amendment. If we find that an amendment could cure the defect, we conclude that the trial court abused its discretion and we reverse; if not, no abuse of discretion has occurred. The plaintiff has the burden of proving that an amendment would cure the defect.' " ( Modisette v. Apple Inc. (2018) 30 Cal.App.5th 136 , 155, 241 Cal.Rptr.3d 209 ; see Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074 , 1081, 6 Cal.Rptr.3d 457 , 79 P.3d 569 .) B. Summers Has Standing To Pursue This Action "Only a real party in interest has standing to prosecute an action, except as otherwise provided by statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.