Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 F.1d 209 - The Thielbek

The Thielbek’s Empirical Analysis

241 F. 209 · 1917

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 1992
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1992

3 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

60191719201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Pennsylvania · The Lottawanna · Robert Workman v. Mayor Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York a · Butler v. Boston & Savannah Steamship Co. · The " Galatea."

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the exercise of this admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, the courts of the United States are exclusively governed by the legislation of Congress, and, in the absence thereof, by the general principles of the maritime law. The states have no rights to prescribe the rules by which the courts of the United States shall act, nor the jurisprudence which they shall administer. If any other doctrine were established, it would amount to a complete surrender of the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States to the fluctuating policy and legislation of the states. If the latter have any right to prescribe any rule, they have a right to prescribe all rules — to limit, control, or bar suits in the national courts. Such a doctrine has never been supported, nor has it for a moment been supposed to exist, at least as far as I have any knowledge, either by any state court or national court within the whole Union. For myself, I can only say that, during the whole of my judicial life, I have never, up to the present hour, heard a single doubt breathed upon the subject.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.