Shoemaker v. Malaxa’s Empirical Analysis
241 F.2d 129 · 1957
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2017
9 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on 133 F. Supp. 496 - Blair Holdings Corporation v. Rubinstein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] stateless person ... is not a citizen or subject of a foreign state within the meaning of 28 [U.S.C.] § 1332(a)(2)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.