Fitzgerald v. Haynes’s Empirical Analysis
241 F.2d 417 · 1957
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2004 · most notably Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson (1968), 360 F. Supp. 366 - In Re Caesars Palace Securities Litigation (1973)
14 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on William Shields v. Robert R Barrow · State of California v. Southern Pac Co · State v. United States · Calcote v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co. · Green v. Brophy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““With one exception, the federal and state courts of first instance which have considered these cases have agreed that the local unions concerned are indispensible parties. ‘The primary interest’ of the local, the ‘primary impact’ of the alleged wrongs upon the local, the indecisive character of adjudication in its absence, and the necessity for construing union charters and association polity have been stressed as reasons for this conclusion. (Citing cases.) We have already indicated our thought that these are good reasons.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.