Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 F.2d 480 - Sigurdson v. Del Guercio

Sigurdson v. Del Guercio’s Empirical Analysis

241 F.2d 480 · 1956

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
February 2008
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2008 · most notably Craig v. United States (1969), 509 F. Supp. 388 - Provience v. Valley Clerks Trust Fund (1981)

5 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

90195619601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 5 U.S.C. § 1001 · 5 U.S.C. § 1009 · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro · Marcello v. Bonds · Fanchon & Marco, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. · S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]hese John Doe complaints are dangerous at any time. It is inviting disaster to allow them to be filed and to allow fictitious persons to remain defendants if the complaint is still of record. Appropriate action has been taken by the trial court on its own motion in some such cases. Although the fact that the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., contain no express prohibition upon the subject, there is no authority of which we are aware for the joining of fictitious defendants in an action under a federal statute. These defendants should have been eliminated by motion of [defendant] Del Guercio.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““These John Doe complaints are dangerous at any time. It is inviting disaster to allow them to be filed and to allow fictitious persons to remain defendants if the complaint is still of record. Appropriate action has been taken by the trial court on its own motion in some such cases. Although”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.