Alterman v. Lydick’s Empirical Analysis
241 F.2d 50 · 1957
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2001
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Faber-Musser Co. v. William E. Dee Clay Manufacturing Co. · Northern Illinois Coal Corp. v. Cryder · Vetesnik v. Magull · Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. Midwest Transfer Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`An apparent agent is a person who, whether or not authorized, reasonably appears to third persons, because of the manifestations of another, to be authorized to act as agent for such other.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.