Campos v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis
241 F.2d 661 · 1957
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 1978
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 124 Cal. App. 2d 229 - Augustine v. Trucco · 35 Cal. 2d 596 - Case v. Kadota Fig Ass'n of Producers · 5 Cal. App. 2d 738 - Atkinson v. District Bond Co. · 95 Cal. App. 2d 159 - Patty v. Berryman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . . [T]o justify the adverse party in treating the renunciation as a breach, the refusal to perform must be of the whole contract or of a covenant going to the whole consideration, and must be distinct, unequivocal, and absolute.’ ” Campos v. Olson, 9 Cir., 241 F.2d 661, 663 ; Atkinson v. District Bond Co., 5 Cal.App.2d 738, 743 , 43 P.2d 867, 869 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.