United States v. Singer’s Empirical Analysis
241 F.2d 717 · 1957
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1993
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 55 · 26 U.S.C. § 7807
Relies on Vernaci v. Louisiana · United States v. Lowe · British Transport Commission v. United States · United States v. Singer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“use [of a tax return], for the purpose of impeachment, was proper.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Chnapkova v. Koh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.