Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 F.3d 103 - Adria International Group Inc Criswell Asssociates Llc v. Ferre Development Inc Angola Investment Inc Mar Chiquita Development Corp

Adria International Group Inc Criswell Asssociates Llc v. Ferre Development Inc Angola Investment Inc Mar Chiquita Development Corp’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

132
cited by 132 later decisions
May 2024
most recently cited

127 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 132 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably 284 F. Supp. 2d 166 - Enterprise Capital, Inc. v. San-Gra Corp. (2003), 486 F. Supp. 2d 58 - Carmack v. National RR Passenger Corp. (2007)

127 district ·

730200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wightman v. Springfield Terminal Railway Co. · Borschow Hospital & Medical Supplies, Inc. v. Cesar Castillo Inc. · Crellin Technologies, Inc. v. Equipmentlease Corp. · Torres Vargas v. Santiago Cummings · Las Colinas Inc Schreibman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 132 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Cross-motions for summary judgment do not alter the basic Rule 56 standard, but rather simply require [the court] to determine whether either of the parties deserves judgment as a matter of law on facts that are not disputed.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “•If-the terms of a contract are clear and leave no doubt as to the intentions of the contracting parties,- the literal sense of its stipulations shall be observed. If the words should appear contrary to the evident intention of the contracting parties, the intention shall prevail. ■”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is no genuine issue as to any material fact and [ ] the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.