Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 FSUPP3D 124 - Ingram v. Shipman-Meyer

Ingram v. Shipman-Meyer’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Graham v. Connor · Scott v. Harris · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he use of force on a suspect who has already been subdued is plainly excessive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.