Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 Ga. App. 546 - Castro v. State

241 Ga. App. 546 - Castro v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Johnson v. State · 239 Ga. App. 52 - Buice v. State · Smith v. State · James v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he grant or denial of a motion for mistrial lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and this discretion will not be disturbed unless manifestly abused. [Cits.] Unless it is obvious that a mistrial is essential to the preservation of the right to a fair trial, appellate courts will not interfere with the exercise of the court's discretion. [Cit.] [12]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.