241 Ga. App. 770 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2008
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 186 Ga. App. 113 - Taylor v. State · 212 Ga. App. 147 - Peterson v. State · 195 Ga. App. 758 - Boyd v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Georgia’s armed robbery statute, the [Missouri conviction’s] language describes that defendant was in possession of a [deadly weapon] when he forcefully and violently took valuables from [the victim]. This is sufficient to prove that defendant was convicted of [an offense in Missouri] which would have . . . been the serious violent felony of armed robbery had [it occurred] in Georgia. OCGA § 17-10-7 (b) (2).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.