Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 Ind. 268 - State v. Kuebel

State v. Kuebel’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
2
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc. (1980), Price v. State (1993)

31 state decisions

120196119701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1464 · 47 U.S.C. § 151 · 47 U.S.C. § 303 (Local Community Radio Act of 2010)

Relies on Roth v. United States · Shelton v. Tucker · Smith v. People of the State of California · United States v. Balint · Federal Radio Commission v. Nelson Bros. Bond & Mortgage Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . The usual rationale for such statutes is that the public interest in the purity of its food is so great as to warrant the imposition of the highest standard of care on distributors—in fact an absolute standard which will not hear the distributor’s plea as to the amount of care he has used. (Cases cited) His ignorance of the character of the food is irrelevant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Noble v. State
  2. ““No law shall be passed, restraining the free interchange of thought and opinion, or restricting the right to speak, write, or print, freely, on any subject whatever: but for the abuse of that right, every person shall be responsible.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.