Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 Ind. 548 - Dunkle v. State

Dunkle v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently November 2011 · most notably Richardson v. State (1999), Elmore v. State (1978)

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

200196119701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Short v. State · Siberry v. State · Leatherman v. Board of Commissioners · Gillenwaters v. Biddle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““4. Aim. ‘The pointing of a weapon, as a gun, a dart, or an arrow, at, or so as to bear upon, the object intended to be struck; the line of sighting; hence, the direction of anything, as a spear, a blow . . . toward a particular point or object, with a view to strike or affect it.’ Webster’s New International Dictionary, Second Edition.” 241 Ind. at 553 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “well established rules of statutory construction, as well as upon the definition of the terms used ... [o]ur conclusion then is that to draw a weapon within the purview of § 448 ... is a separate and distinct offense from that of pointing or aiming a weapon under § 452.... Appellant was not therefore twice convicted for but one offense....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Whoever draws, or threatens to use, any pistol, dirk, knife, slung-shot or other deadly or dangerous weapon, already drawn upon any other person, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor.. ..””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.