State v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The ABA Standards Relating To the Function of the Trial Judge, § 6.6 at 84, 85 (Approved Draft, 1972), suggest the trial judge’s inquiry show that the defendant: ‘(i) has been clearly advised of his right to the assistance of counsel, including his right to die assignment of counsel when he is so entided; ‘(ii) possesses the intelligence and capacity to appreciate the consequences of tiiis decision; and '(in) comprehends the nature of the charges and proceedings, die range of permissible punishments, and any additional facts essential to a broad understanding of the case.’ “To that, we would suggest that the trial judge also inform die defendant (1) that defendant-will be held to the same standards as a lawyer; (2) that the trial judge may not aid the defendant in his defense; and (3) that it is advisable to have a lawyer due to the specialized knowledge necessary to conduct a trial and the fact that a lawyer is trained in the law.” Daniels, 2 Kan. App. 2d at 607-08 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Lawson

2. ““ ‘(i) has been clearly advised of his right to the assistance of counsel, including his right to the assignment of counsel when he is so entitled; “ ’(ii) possesses the intelligence and capacity to appreciate the consequences of this decision; and “ ‘(in) comprehends the nature of the charges and proceedings, the range of permissible punishments, and any additional facts essential to a broad understanding of the case.’ ” 2 Kan. App. 2d at 607-08 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Buckland

3. ““It is well settled that all participants in a crime are equally guilty without regard to tire extent of their participation, and that any person who counsels, aids or abets in the commission of an offense may be charged, tried and convicted in the same manner as though, he were a principal. [Citation omitted.]” (Emphasis added.) 236 Kan. at 846 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 50 Kan. App. 2d 922 - State v. Ramirez