Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 241 Md. 579 - Riddle v. Dickens

Riddle v. Dickens’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 1988
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1988

7 state decisions

30196619701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wilhelm v. State of Maryland Traffic Safety Commission · Langenfelder v. Thompson · Wolfinger v. Frey · Yellow Cab Co. v. Hicks · Yellow Cab Co. v. Henderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In order to establish a diagnosis or prognosis an examining doctor may rely on statements, pathologically germane, given to him by the patient, but if he is to testify as to a causal relationship he must do so in response to a hypothetical question.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.