Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2008
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Costello v. State · Wilson v. State · Burley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In Wilson v. State, 227 Md. 99, 101 , 175 A.2d 775 , we held Rule 744 a, the predecessor of the present Rule 764 a, to be a ‘statutory remedy’ within the meaning of the above quoted portion of the Act, and we therefore held that an over-ruled motion to strike out a judgment and sentence was not reviewable by this Court, unless the proceeding below was brought under the Post Conviction Procedure Act. See also Burley v. State, 239 Md. 342, 344 , 211 A.2d 714 [ (1965) ]; Costello v. State, 237 Md. 464, 470 , 206 A.2d 812 [(1965)], and cases cited at page 101 of 227 Md.[, 175 A.2d 775 ].” 241 Md. at 598 , 217 A.2d at 308 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Valentine v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.