Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

241 Mich. 508

217 N.W 885

Stegeman v. Stegeman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1928

Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1928-02-14

Decided 1928-02-14

¶1While I do not agree with Justice BIRD that the plaintiff is entitled to recover as the holder of a vendor's lien, I concur with him in the result because the claims of Wiger and Stegeman are placed prior to the claim of the bank. The equities of the case require this; and since there is ample property to satisfy the claims of both Wiger and Stegeman, it is of no practical importance which of these two has priority *522

/241/mich/508 · .json · Public domain